×

(908) 329-2003

Case Results

Home /  Pennsylvania /  Case Results

Our Commitment To Excellence

Verdicts & Settlements

  • Our Easton Car Accident Case Result: $500,000 Settlement After T-Bone Crash near William Penn Highway

Location: Bethlehem Township near Easton, Pennsylvania (William Penn Highway and Sheridan Drive)
Court: Northampton County Court of Common Pleas
Injuries: Concussion, thoracic outlet syndrome, shoulder surgery, neck injuries, back injuries, airbag injuries
Result: $500,000 combined settlement
Insurance Issues: One injured occupant had selected Pennsylvania’s limited-tort option, while the other had full-tort coverage. That distinction became important as the case progressed because Pennsylvania law treats those claims differently.

On an autumn Friday evening in Easton, as the leaves had changed color and begun to fall, two friends were on their way home when their lives changed at the intersection of Nicholas Street and Sheridan Drive, a block from William Penn Highway, and just a few blocks from Stones Crossing Drive, the nearby intersection many locals simply call Stones Crossing.

Our clients were traveling in a Scion when the vehicle was T-boned by a Mercedes. Bethlehem Township Police responded to the scene. Both women were hurt badly enough that they had to be taken by ambulance to St. Luke’s Hospital–Anderson Campus.

Vehicle Damage and Airbag Deployment After the Easton T-Bone Crash

Damaged Scion After Easton T-Bone Crash Near William Penn Highway And Sheridan Drive

Vehicle damage from our Easton T-bone crash case near William Penn Highway and Sheridan Drive. The case resolved for a combined $500,000 settlement.

Side Curtain Airbag Deployment Inside Scion After Easton Pennsylvania T-Bone Crash

Side-curtain airbags deployed inside the Scion after the crash. Both occupants were taken by ambulance to St. Luke’s Hospital–Anderson Campus.

These case photos help show why the insurance company’s early offer did not reflect the seriousness of the crash. This was not a minor property-damage claim. The Scion sustained significant side-impact damage, multiple airbags deployed, both occupants were transported by ambulance, and both women required months of follow-up treatment. The case later required litigation in Northampton County, expert reports, and proof of how Pennsylvania’s limited-tort and full-tort rules affected the claims.

The driver of the Scion was diagnosed with a concussion and significant neck and shoulder injuries, including numbness radiating into her fingers. The passenger, who owned the Scion, suffered bruising and lacerations from the airbag deployment and crash impact, along with severe neck pain. Both women were released from the hospital and needed follow-up orthopedic care. Both later treated with physical therapy for several months.

The conduct of the Mercedes driver stood out immediately. He was belligerent at the scene, yelling obscenities after the crash. His behavior reportedly continued at St. Luke’s, where he was ultimately removed by hospital security. That conduct did not make this a drunk driving case by itself, but it became part of the factual story of how the crash and its aftermath unfolded.

The insurance issues were also complicated. The passenger and vehicle owner had a limited tort policy. The driver had full tort coverage through a separate insurer. Those different tort selections mattered because Pennsylvania law treats limited tort and full tort claims very differently.

After the insurance company for the at-fault driver made an offer that did not reflect the seriousness of the injuries, suit was filed in Northampton County and began discovery. As the case moved forward, the driver required surgery related to her diagnosis of thoracic outlet syndrome. The passenger initially had difficulty getting consistent treatment because she did not have health insurance, but we helped move her care in the right direction. She later required shoulder surgery and additional treatment for back injuries.

The cases moved through discovery, expert reports were exchanged, and the claims advanced toward trial. Northampton County car accident cases can take time to reach trial, but litigation pressure, medical proof, expert support, and persistence changed the value of the case.

The claims eventually resolved for a combined $500,000 settlement.

Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Every case depends on its own facts, injuries, insurance coverage, liability evidence, medical records, expert opinions, and available insurance.

  • A Real Warren County Car Accident Case on Route 46

In one New Jersey car accident case handled by our firm, our client was a woman in her 60s, a mother and grandmother, who was driving on Route 46 in Warren County on a Friday afternoon. She was on her way back to her home in Mountain Lake in Liberty Township when another driver caused a crash.

At first, she thought she was okay. Like many people after a crash, she hoped the soreness would pass. But by the next day, her neck pain had worsened enough that she went to the emergency room at St. Luke’s Warren Hospital in Phillipsburg.

How She Found Santini Law

She was referred to Santini Personal Injury & Car Accident Law by a relative who was familiar with the first-class way our firm treats elderly clients. That mattered to her. She did not want to be treated like a claim number. She wanted someone who would listen, explain the process, and make sure her case was handled with patience and care. She was referred to Santini Personal Injury & Car Accident Law because her family wanted a New Jersey personal injury lawyer who would treat her with patience, respect, and care.

That is personal for Frank Santini. Mr. Santini has deep roots in Phillipsburg and was very close with his grandparents in the area. Our firm understands that when an older client is hurt in a car accident, the case is not just about medical records and insurance forms. It is about protecting someone’s dignity, independence, and quality of life.

After we connected with her, we helped refer her to a doctor near her home so she could get treatment for her neck without having to travel unnecessarily.

The New Jersey Limited Tort Problem

When we reviewed her auto insurance declaration page, we learned that she was subject to New Jersey’s limitation on lawsuit option, often called the limited tort or verbal threshold. That was important because limited tort can restrict an injured person’s ability to recover money for pain and suffering unless the injury meets one of New Jersey’s qualifying categories.

For many car accident victims, the key issue is whether they suffered a permanent injury supported by objective medical evidence. New Jersey’s model jury charge explains that a plaintiff subject to the limitation-on-lawsuit option generally must prove a permanent injury to recover noneconomic damages, and New Jersey’s no-fault statute defines permanent injury as an injury where the body part or organ has not healed to function normally and will not heal to function normally with further medical treatment.

In plain English, it was not enough for our client to say her neck hurt. We had to prove the injury with medical records and objective testing, including MRI evidence.

Resolution

Our client went through conservative treatment and had an MRI. Even though she did not undergo aggressive treatment or surgery, we were able to develop the medical proof needed to overcome New Jersey’s limited tort threshold.

The case ultimately settled for $110,000.

This case is a reminder that insurance companies often try to minimize claims involving older clients, conservative treatment, or modest vehicle damage. But a crash does not have to destroy a vehicle to seriously affect someone’s neck, daily routine, sleep, independence, or ability to enjoy time with family. In New Jersey, especially when limited tort applies, the details matter: the insurance policy, the medical timeline, the diagnostic testing, and the way the injury is documented from the beginning.

Schedule A Consultation

Fields marked with an * are required

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Article

Practice Areas

Testimonials

Let Us Get You Started In The
Right Direction

Fields marked with an * are required

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.